Study Japanese 101

Disclosures and recommendations

Study Japanese 101 is a curated Japanese resource guide. This page states how outbound links, commercial relationships, and product claims work.

4 min read

/go/[offer] is the control plane for outbound destinations. Owned and affiliate offers land on a disclosure page first. Other offers redirect to an allowlisted official host. Routes are noindex and do not accept an arbitrary destination. They store an aggregate offer-ID count only, with no IP addresses, user agents, or persistent identifiers. See Privacy.

Links to other resources go to their official sites. They are provided for verification and reader convenience.

Owned products

The Study Japanese 101 team owns and operates Inku. We prioritize Inku in relevant recommendations while explaining product limits and alternatives.

Newsletter

New newsletter signups are paused. Study Japanese 101 is not accepting or storing new addresses. Earlier hashed-key records in a private Cloudflare KV namespace can only be removed through the unsubscribe form on newsletter. There is no list vendor. See Privacy.

Affiliate and paid placement status

Study Japanese 101 does not sell ranking positions and does not operate a broad affiliate-link program.

Kakitori (added 2026-10-14): links to Kakitori through /go/kakitori use a Kakitori referral link. Affiliate link: we may earn a commission if you make an eligible purchase. The Kakitori profile and its outbound link carry this label.

For Kakitori and any later commercial relationship:

  1. the affected link or section will be labeled near the point of decision;
  2. payment will not rewrite the stated tradeoffs or remove better-fit alternatives; and
  3. this page will be updated with the program and date.

Product claims and prices

Software, pricing, trials, and platform support change. Resource profiles list the first-party pages checked and the date of our last review. Always confirm material terms on the official site before subscribing.

Our qualitative statements, such as “lower setup” or “more rigid path,” are editorial judgments based on the described workflow. They are not laboratory findings or guarantees of learning outcomes.